Consortium for Integrated Management of Stored Product Insect Pests
 

Home Up

Methyl Bromide Alternatives

A. Alternative Fumigant(s)

Project personnel: Dirk Maier, Charles Woloshuk

 

[2001 Annual Reports] [2002 Annual Reports]

    The U.S. Clean Air Act legislates that methyl bromide, one of only two available fumigants, will be phased out from use in the United States by the year 2005. The remaining fumigant, phosphine, is currently undergoing reregistration. Research is needed to evaluate the feasibility, and optimize the application of alternative pest control technologies in the stored food grain ecosystem. Ozone (O3), one of the strongest oxidizing agents known, is an environmentally friendly alternative to other traditional food storage chemicals primarily because it has a short half-life, leaves no residue, decomposes rapidly to diatomic oxygen (O2) which is a natural component in the atmosphere. Ozone can be generated on site and thus requires no storage facilities or logistical issues related to transportation. Ozonation combined with either chilled aeration or alone, is a bio-rational alternative that may be used to suppress insect pest populations in stored grain. Our on-going research has demonstrated that ozone is also a very effective insect control agent and has some efficacy against mold spores (Strait 1997, Mason et al. 1997). The proposed project extends our ozone research to the application research and technology transfer phase by further examining the economics of ozonation and determining the optimal fumigation parameters in large-scale farm and commercial storage structures.

B. Heat

Project personnel: Bh. Subramanyam, Paul Flinn, Barry Dover, Frank Arthur, Gerrit Cuperus, Tom Phillips

 

    The use of heat to control insects in flour mills and other food-handling establishments was proposed more than six decades ago (Goodwin 1922, Pepper and Strand 1935). Fields (1992) provided a comprehensive review of literature on the control of stored-product insects and mites with extreme temperatures. Heat is a viable alternative to methyl bromide. Heat usually distributes well in a facility, although it will not penetrate materials like grain and flour. It is relatively safe in that personnel can move freely within a facility during a heat-up, and portions of food-handling establishments that are not being heated can still be operational. A heat treatment does not leave any toxic residues. K-State research results on heat since May 1999 are posted at the following web site: http://www.oznet.ksu.edu/dp_grsi/heattreat.htm. Typically heat supplied by gas, electric, or steam heaters is used to raise the temperature within the food-handling establishment to 50oC, and this temperature is held for 24-36 hours to kill insects inside machinery and in building cracks and crevices. Eight species of insects exposed to a heat treatment died within 4 hours during August 4-6, 1999 heat treatment of K-State’s flour and feed mills. Insect traps placed throughout mills before and after heat treatment showed >90% reduction in insect populations following a heat treatment. Better assessment of insect populations within mill machinery and in raw ingredients is needed to accurately gauge heat treatment effectiveness. We propose to develop a degree-hour model to predict insect mortality during a heat treatment. Laboratory experiments at several constant and variable temperatures, simulating an actual heat-up, will be performed in a programmable oven to establish a base temperature to start accumulating degree-hours. This model will be validated during actual heat treatments in K-State’s pilot mills and in commercial food-handling establishments. A better understanding of occurrence and dynamics of insect populations will be obtained by sampling static grain and flour residues from floor and within mill machinery. The K-State’s pilot mills and commercial food-handling establishments will be a part of this study. Assessment of populations from these residues will be compared with trap catches. A better assessment of insect populations within food-handling establishments is needed to gauge treatment effectiveness with heat or any other control measure. Our research will also develop cost-benefit analyses for heat treatments.

 

Copyright © 2001 CIMSPIP
Contact Web Maintenance personnel:
Bhadriraju Subramanyam, 
Sham Kashyap (kashyap AT ksu.edu)