|
Methyl Bromide Alternatives
A. Alternative Fumigant(s)
Project personnel: Dirk
Maier, Charles Woloshuk
The U.S. Clean Air Act legislates
that methyl bromide, one of only two available fumigants,
will be phased out from use in the United States by the year 2005. The
remaining fumigant, phosphine, is currently
undergoing reregistration. Research is needed
to evaluate the feasibility, and optimize the application of alternative
pest control technologies in the
stored food grain ecosystem. Ozone (O3),
one of the strongest oxidizing
agents known, is an environmentally friendly alternative to other
traditional food storage chemicals
primarily because it has a short half-life, leaves no residue, decomposes
rapidly to diatomic oxygen (O2)
which is a natural component in the atmosphere.
Ozone can be generated on site and thus requires no storage facilities
or logistical issues related to
transportation. Ozonation combined with either chilled aeration or
alone, is a bio-rational alternative that may be used to suppress insect
pest populations in stored grain.
Our on-going research has demonstrated that ozone is also a very effective
insect control agent and has some efficacy against mold spores (Strait
1997, Mason et al. 1997). The
proposed project extends our ozone research to the application research
and technology transfer phase by further examining the economics of
ozonation and determining the
optimal fumigation parameters in large-scale farm and commercial storage
structures.
B. Heat
Project personnel:
Bh.
Subramanyam, Paul Flinn, Barry Dover,
Frank
Arthur, Gerrit
Cuperus, Tom Phillips
The use of heat to control insects in
flour mills and other food-handling establishments
was proposed more than six decades ago (Goodwin 1922, Pepper and Strand
1935). Fields (1992) provided a comprehensive review of literature on
the control of
stored-product insects and mites with extreme temperatures. Heat is a
viable alternative
to methyl bromide. Heat usually distributes well in a facility, although
it will not
penetrate materials like grain and flour. It is relatively safe in that
personnel can move
freely within a facility during a heat-up, and portions of food-handling
establishments that are not
being heated can still be operational. A heat treatment does not
leave any toxic residues. K-State research results on heat since May
1999 are posted at
the following web site: http://www.oznet.ksu.edu/dp_grsi/heattreat.htm.
Typically heat
supplied by gas, electric, or steam heaters is used to raise the
temperature within the food-handling
establishment to 50oC,
and this temperature is held for 24-36 hours to kill insects
inside machinery and in building cracks and crevices. Eight species of
insects exposed to a
heat treatment died within 4 hours during August 4-6, 1999 heat
treatment of K-State’s
flour and feed mills. Insect traps placed throughout mills before and
after heat treatment
showed >90% reduction in insect populations following a heat
treatment. Better
assessment of insect populations within mill machinery and in raw
ingredients is needed
to accurately gauge heat treatment effectiveness. We
propose to develop a degree-hour model to predict insect mortality
during a heat
treatment. Laboratory experiments at several constant and variable
temperatures, simulating
an actual heat-up, will be performed in a programmable oven to establish
a base temperature
to start accumulating degree-hours. This model will be validated during
actual heat treatments in K-State’s pilot mills and in commercial
food-handling establishments.
A better understanding of occurrence and dynamics of insect populations will be obtained by
sampling static grain and flour residues from floor and within mill machinery. The K-State’s
pilot mills and commercial food-handling establishments will be
a part of this study. Assessment of populations from these residues will
be compared with
trap catches. A better assessment of insect populations within
food-handling establishments
is needed to gauge treatment effectiveness with heat or any other
control measure. Our
research will also develop cost-benefit analyses for heat treatments. |
|