Consortium for Integrated Management of Stored Product Insect Pests
 

Home Up

Aeration Management

Project personnel: Frank Arthur, Paul Flinn, James Throne, Dirk Maier, Charles Woloshuk, Carl Reed

 

    Simulated field research (Arthur 1994, 1995, Arthur and Throne 1995), and modeling studies based on historical weather data (Arthur and Johnson 1995, Arthur et al. 1998), have demonstrated the potential for the expanded use of controlled low-volume aeration on corn stored in the southern United States and wheat in Kansas (Reed and Harner 1998). Modeling research has also shown the benefits of aeration for corn stored in the northern United States (Arthur and coworkers, unpublished data). In modeling studies with stored wheat, an additional summer aeration cycle reduced populations of the rusty grain beetle below levels obtained with the standard autumn and winter cooling cycles (Flinn et al. 1997, Arthur and Flinn 2000). These studies have demonstrated the benefits of aeration, and provided practical guidelines for using aeration in different geographic regions of the U.S. to control insect pests in bulk grains. As part of the proposed research, new modeling studies will be conducted specifically to evaluate different aeration management strategies for stored wheat and stored corn. Simulated field research in small-scale bins will be conducted to validate the population models.

    By further understanding aeration and its influence on the heat and mass transfer during storage it is believed that food safety issues related to fungi, mycotoxin and insect development can be economically slowed to levels that do not require the application of chemical pesticides to the stored product itself. Crops that are harvested during the summer, such as oats, wheat, and rice, can result in grain temperature during storage of 20°-30°C that are optimal for stored-product insects. In both of these cases grain chilling may be an effective alternative to ambient aeration (Maier, 1992). However, a substantial amount of electrical energy is required to chill a bin; however, costs are comparable or less than fumigation costs. If a bin was cooled with ambient air in the fall and winter, then partial chilling could be used during the summer, and the electric energy consumption of a chiller would be significantly reduced (Montross, 1999).

 

Copyright © 2001 CIMSPIP
Contact Web Maintenance personnel:
Bhadriraju Subramanyam, 
Sham Kashyap (kashyap AT ksu.edu)