
Extension Foods and Nutrition, Cooperative Extension
Service, Kansas State University
July/August 1992
- What's New
- McDonald's Teams Up With
SNE
- Please Return Book
-
- Food/Nutrition
Policy/Legislation
- Food Shoppers Respond to
Food Label Formats
-
- Food Safety
- Foodsaver Compact
- Biotech Foods Approved
- BST and Milk Safety
- Consumers See Biotech Foods
as ' Favorable '
-
- Limited Resource
- Shortages of Surplus Food
-
- Nutrition/Health
- World Food Day
- Are We Promoting Obesity in
Our Schools?
- Ask the Specialist
- Modifying Recipes
- Percent of Calories From
Fat
- Communication and Nutrition
Programs
- Food Allergies in Infants
- Baby-Friendly Hospital
Initiative
- Let's Eat More Fruits and
Vegetables
- Incidence of Low Birth
Weight Is Up
-
- Resources
- McDonald's Today - Promotes
Dietary Guidelines
McDonald's Teams Up With SNE
The Society for Nutrition Education has
undertaken a partnership project with the McDonald's
Corporation to develop an educational program aimed at
children. The program is entitled "What's on Your
Plate?" and is a series of 55-second public service
announcements (PSAs). The PSAs teach children about
health-promoting food choices through the "fun and
engaging escapades" of original clay animation
characters. They will be aired on CBS-TV Saturday
mornings beginning sometime this fall. They are to be
shown between some of the most popular shows and will
reach around 2 to 2.5 million children each Saturday.
An educational brochure is
also being developed to support the series. No reference
will be made in the PSAs or the brochure to any
McDonald's product and SNE was responsible for assuring
the credibility of the health and nutrition information.
Be watching for them this fall. (PP)
Please Return Book
Karen may have loaned one of her books to
an agent in March. The book is "FOOD TRENDS AND THE
CHANGING CONSUMER" by Senauer, Asp and Kinsey; it's
a hardback. If you have it, please return to Karen
Penner. Thanks. (JD)
Food Shoppers Respond
to Food Label Formats
The FDA recently completed two consumer
food label surveys in conjunction with the Nutrition
Education and Labeling Act of 1990. Results will be used
to make policy decisions on new label formats. Mall
shoppers in various locations were asked to perform tasks
to show how well the formats could be used to compare
nutrients between products and to choose the format they
considered most helpful and least helpful for selecting
nutritious meals and planning menus. Other shoppers were
surveyed to measure additional label uses. Surveyed
shoppers wanted a short, easy-to-read, easily interpreted
food label that would provide more information than the
current label. They tended to prefer labels with the most
information, but when participants tried to use them,
these complex labels were harder to use. Thus, preference
did not correspond with performance. Whether a consumer
can actually make practical use of the label is the more
important consideration.
As a result of the survey,
FDA researchers grouped consumers into these types: 1)
those who are already motivated to use a nutrition label,
2) those who are not, and 3) those who would use the
label if it were easy to use. Motivated consumers were
divided into two categories: the healthy educated and the
health-compromised with a desire to know.
What kind of a label
reader are you? (KP)
Source: FDA Consumer, June
1992.
Foodsaver Compact
Foodsaver compact, the home vacuum packing
system, is available for purchase ($200) and needs to be
understood. It does not replace processing in a boiling
water bath or pressure canner. If a food would normally
require refrigeration or freezing, then it still must be
refrigerated or frozen when vacuum packed.
This vacuum packing system
can be used with Foodsaver bags, mason jars or Foodsaver
canisters. As a general rule refrigerated fresh foods
will keep about twice as long as without vacuum
packaging. When foods are frozen in vacuum packed
Foodsaver bags freezer burn is eliminated. Dry foods that
are vacuum packed will have a longer shelf life.
All foods to be vacuum
packed in containers need to be cool or at room
temperature so that liquids will not boil over.
One of the selling points
of the Foodsaver Compact is that you might save money.
Their cost comparison says if you spend $250 at the
supermarket on groceries each month, with this device you
can save $177.50 by purchasing at a bulk warehouse plus
saving the typical 15% of all solid food which ends up in
the trash.
So, what do you need to
consider to decide if this device is something you want.
Do you or can you purchase food at a bulk price? Do you
have enough storage space - cupboards, refrigerator and
freezer? Do you have the time to do the procedure? Do you
have $200 plus more if you need more bags or canisters?
(JD)
Biotech Foods Approved
The Food and Drug Administration (FDA)
issued a policy statement on foods from new plant
varieties derived from recombinant DNA techniques and
cell fusion techniques that enable developers to make
genetic modifications in plants, some of which would not
be possible with traditional plant breeding methods. The
policy discusses the safety and regulatory status of
foods derived from new plant varieties.
Under the policy, foods
such as fruits, vegetables, grains and their byproducts
developed by the new genetic modification methods are
regulated under the existing Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act.
The key factors in reviewing safety concerns are the
characteristics of the food product rather than the
method by which it is produced.
The policy includes a
"guidance to industry" section that describes
food safety and nutritional concerns and identifies
situations when producers need to consult with FDA on
scientific issues and to determine if a food additive
petition may need to be filed. According to the policy, a
scientific basis should exist to establish new plant
varieties that do not result in unacceptable levels of
nutrients, natural toxicants or allergens. Safety
assessments need to be conducted to assure that foods
from the new plant varieties will be safe to consume.
(KP)
Source: Fed. Reg, 57(104),
May 29, 1992.
BST and Milk Safety
An article in the May 1992 issue of
Consumer Reports magazine claims that using bovine growth
hormone to increase milk production in dairy cows might
have negative effects on human and animal health and lead
to increased residues of antibiotics in the milk supply.
The following may be used to answer public inquiries.
The effect of all
veterinary drugs on food consumed by people is a
principal concern of FDA. Before allowing drugs for
food-producing animals to be marketed, FDA requires that
these drugs be shown to be safe by rigorous scientific
studies. Safety in this context means, among other
things, that residues of the drug in meat, milk and eggs
are safe for people to eat.
FDA has evaluated all
aspects of BST 's safety for human food, including the
effect of very high doses of BST on the content of BST in
milk and the effect of BST on the concentration of
insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF-1), a protein hormone,
in milk. Numerous studies, including the data on BST
evaluated by FDA, have been published in scientific
journals.
After a thorough review of
these studies, FDA concluded that milk derived from cows
treated with BST is safe for human consumption. This
conclusion was supported by an independent scientific
panel of experts at the Technology Assessment Conference
of the National Institutes of Health in 1990. The
European Community and the government of Canada have
reached similar conclusions about the safety of milk from
BST-treated cows. (KP)
Consumers See Biotech
Foods as 'Favorable'
Four out of five people in focus group
research conducted by a food science society have a
favorable view of biotechology applied to food, The
Institute of Food Technologists (IFT) reported recently.
IFT, a 25,000-member
scientific society, interviewed consumers in focus groups
in Colorado, Nebraska, New York, Ohio and Pennsylvania.
Besides discussing
biotechnology and food safety, focus group participants
were given questionnaires before and after discussion.
After discussion among themselves, "favorable"
responses about biotechnology rose from 70 percent to 78
percent and "very favorable" responses went up
from 10 percent to 15 percent.
These responses were to
the question: "Based on what you know of
biotechnology, what is your overall impression?"
Consumers in focus groups,
of 8-12 people, who were probed on given topics, approved
of increased milk production (70 percent) and lower-fat
meat (91 percent) using biotechnology.
These consumers told
researchers they believed government funding for
biotechnology research should be increased. They also
said Americans need more information about the use of
biotechnology.
The same respondents
reported some concerns about the safety of the food
supply, but a majority expressed "some
confidence" (46 percent) or "a lot of
confidence" (23 percent) in governments' ability to
keep foods safe.
When asked how much
control they felt they personally had over the safety of
the food they ate, 51 percent replied "some",
16 percent said "a lot" while 30 percent
responded "a little." Consumers said that
bacteria in foods were the most serious short-term risk
to their health.
The IFT focus groups were
conducted in March and April in Fort Morgan and Denver,
CO; Lincoln, NE; Elmira, NY; Columbus, OH, and Bensalem,
PA. (KP)
Source: IFT, May 27, 1992.
Shortages of Surplus Food
Thousands of hungry Americans are being
turned away from food banks because USDA is running out
of surplus commodities. Senator Patrick Leahy (D-VT) and
an anti-hunger activist expressed concern about the
impact on families this summer. Rep. Bob Wise (D-WV)
said, "There is something very wrong with USDA's
policy when they aggressively subsidize overseas food
exports at the same time commodities are being denied to
food banks, school nutrition programs and soup kitchens.
This policy is being implemented at the same time there
is a record number of Americans on food stamps."
(MS)
Source: Associated Press,
June 10, 1992
World
Food Day
World Food Day, (WFD), October 16, was
initiated 12 years ago. It is a worldwide event designed
to increase awareness, understanding and informed,
year-around, long-term action on the complex issue of
food security for all.
Being a part of WFD on
October 16 starts a process -- from interest to
commitment, from ideas to action, from local problem
awareness to international understanding, from single-day
observances to year around planning and programs. WFD
asks you to become involved in that process as part of a
global movement dedicated to hunger alleviation and food
security.
World Food Day was created
by the member nations of the UN Food and Agriculture
Organization (FAO). Now observed in more than 150
counties, the day's purpose is to focus attention on all
food and farm problems, and to get the people of the
world more directly involved in the search for solutions.
The U. S. observance is coordinated by the U. S. National
Committee for World Food Day, made up of 450 private
voluntary organizations, and the U. S. Department of
Agriculture. But the main effort comes from more than
16,000 local organizers in all 50 states.
What Do People Do
On World Food Day?
WFD is observed in hundreds of ways around the
world. There is no one way. Each nation, each community,
each person is free to choose and plan the most
useful/effective ways to increase informed action. Here
are just a few:
Increase Awareness -
arrange media coverage or concentrate on
increasing the understanding of persons in the
media.
Increase
Understanding - plan education efforts from
nursery schools to colleges and universities to
senior citizen centers.
Increase Information
- conduct research and publicize findings on
local situations through use of documentaries,
graduate school projects, public surveys and
government task forces (all levels).
Increase Services-
establish or strengthen services, from emergency
food pantries to comprehensive
food/nutrition/health programs.
Increase Support -
make WFD a common fundraising opportunity for
domestic as well as international programs and
projects.
Increase Advocacy -
launch campaigns to demonstrate a caring,
informed constituency for policies (from local to
international) that place food security issues on
the "front burner..seeking commitments from
candidates and/or public officials... from the
town council to the "leader of the free
world."
Increase Networking -
use WFD to find ways to make the thousands of
local-global links among people and between
issues. Use WFD to discover almost infinite
combinations of people, ideas and resources.
How Do We
Determine What Is The Best Way To Observe The Day In Our
Community?
Request the WFD booklet "Ideas in
Action" to learn what others are doing. Form a
committee or coalition .. develop a consensus about what
to do .. divide the responsibilities and go to work. The
national office can often put you in touch with others
who have tried what you want to do and thus help you skip
some trials and errors.
For further information,
contact: Patricia Young, National Coordinator; The
National Committee for World Food Day; 1001 22nd Street,
N.W.; Washington, D.C. 20437; 202-653-2404. (JD)
Are We Promoting
Obesity in Our Schools?
One
of the most common nutritional problems for children is
obesity. About one in four elementary school children are
overweight in New York, according to a Cornell University
study. There is no reason to believe that other states
are any different. In the U.S., childhood obesity has
increased dramatically in the last 15 years. Fifty
percent more children are now overweight. Not only do
obese children have an increased risk for obesity later
in life, they often suffer the same health problems as
obese adults. Overweight children are usually physically
unfit and at risk for hypertension, atherosclerosis,
adult-onset diabetes, orthopedic disorders, respiratory
disease, and psychosocial dysfunction.
Obesity occurs in both
genders and all socioeconomic classes. But Wendy Wolfe,
the Cornell nutritionist that conducted the study
mentioned above, says children are more likely to be
overweight if they: live in low-income families, have no
or few siblings, skip breakfast, or participate in school
lunch programs (which tend to have more calories from fat
than the recommended 30 percent).
Wolfe also looked at grade
school physical education programs and their effect on
obesity. She found that when schools offered 120 minutes
of physical education per week they had significantly
lower rates of obesity than schools that offered less.
Unfortunately she also found that in New York State only
25 percent of schools offered this much PE to second
graders and only 40 percent offered this much to fifth
graders.
In addition, some teachers
use candy or snacks for positive reinforcement in the
classroom or participate in promotions offered by
fast-food establishments. Lunchrooms provide high fat
snacks and desserts in many schools.
Children consume much of
their daily food in school. This is one of the easiest
ways to reach them with nutrition messages. October
11-17, 1992 is National School Lunch Week - what a great
time to promote the consistency of nutrition messages so
that the quality of food and nutrition activities already
in place can be enhanced. (PP)
Sources: Susan S. Lang. A
fourth of schoolchildren are overweight. Forum, Winter
1992.. RC Klesges, RJ Stein, LH Eck, TR Isbell, and LM
Klesges. Parental influence on food selection in young
children and its relationships to childhood obesity. AJCN
1991; 53:859-64.
Ask the Specialist
What is an RE and what does it measure?
Answer: RE stands for
retinol equivalent and is a measure of vitamin A activity
or potency. Numerous forms of vitamin A are found in both
animal and plant foods. Animal foods, such as liver and
butter, have the fat-soluble forms that can be very toxic
if large amounts are consumed. These related compounds
are found as retinol, retinal and retinoic acid, almost
all of them coming from animal foods. Plant carotenoids,
deep yellow in color, are vitamin A precursors and
provitamin forms. Their lesser potency is also measured
in RE but it takes more (6 micrograms (mcg) of
beta-carotene or 12 mcg of other carotenoids) to equal 1
RE of retinol. REs have replaced the old International
Units (IU). To compare REs with IUs, one RE equals 3.33
IUs of retinol and 10 IUs of beta-carotene. (MC)
Modifying Recipes
Those who attended the Food for the 90s
workshop seemed to really enjoy the lab sessions. Food
items were made that compared an original higher fat,
cholesterol or sodium recipe to a modified recipe lower
in one or all three nutrients.
For the next few months,
an original and modified recipe will be highlighted.
- Chicken and Potatoes
Oregano (Original)
- 3 medium sized
potatoes (1 lb)
- 1/2 cup onion, minced
- vegetable cooking
spray
- 4 tablespoons
margarine
- 8 medium-sized
chicken thighs (2 lbs)
- 1/8 teaspoon pepper
- 1 tablespoon chopped
parsley
- 1 teaspoon salt
- 1 teaspoon oregano
leaves
1. Peel potatoes; cut into
1/2 inch cubes. Mince onion.
2. Spray 12-inch non-stick skillet with vegetable cooking
spray; place over medium heat. Melt margarine in skillet;
add potatoes, onion and chicken thighs; sprinkle with
salt, pepper and 1/2 the oregano. Cook about 15 minutes,
gently turning potatoes often with pancake turner.
3. Turn thighs; sprinkle with rest of oregano and cook 10
minutes longer or until potatoes and thighs are well
browned and fork-tender. Sprinkle with parsley. Serves 4.
- Chicken and Potatoes
Oregano (Modified)
- To modify the recipe
change two (2) ingredients. Instead of four (4)
tablespoons margarine, use 2. Instead of 8 medium
sized chicken thighs (with bone and skin) use 8
medium-sized skinless, boneless thighs.
-
- 3 medium sized
potatoes (1 lb)
- 1/2 cup onion, minced
- vegetable cooking
spray
- 2 tablespoons
margarine
- 8 medium-sized
boneless, skinless chicken thighs (2 lbs)
- 1 teaspoon salt
- 1/8 teaspoon pepper
- 1 teaspoon oregano
leaves
- 1 tablespoon chopped
parsley
1. Peel potatoes; cut into
1/2 inch cubes. Mince onion.
2. Spray 12-inch non-stick skillet with vegetable cooking
spray; place over medium heat. Melt margarine in skillet;
add potatoes, onion and chicken thighs; sprinkle with
salt, pepper and 1/2 the oregano. Cook about 15 minutes,
gently turning potatoes often with pancake turner.
3. Turn thighs; sprinkle with rest of oregano and cook 10
minutes longer or until potatoes and thighs are well
browned and fork-tender. Sprinkle with parsley. Serves 4.
Nutrition per Serving
| |
Original |
Modified |
| Calories |
524 |
371 |
| Fat |
32 g |
17 g |
| Cholesterol |
114 mg |
98 mg |
| Sodium |
1038 mg |
955 mg |
| Percent
Calories From Fat* |
59% |
41 % |
*See article below (JD)
Percent of Calories From Fat
Some of the agents have asked for fat
guidelines on recipes. No one has done that. The dietary
guidelines of 30 percent of your calories from fat is for
a total diet not one recipe.
The Mealtime/Family Time
menus were designed so that the whole meal is within the
30 percent of calories from fat guideline. Let's look at
the main course in three of these menus to see what the
fat percentage is for the main course alone and compared
to the whole meal.
- Tangy Beef Stew Menu
- Total calories of
meal -- 606
- Calories of stew --
264
- Fat from stew -- 7.3g
- Percent of fat
calories for stew -- 25%
- Percent of fat
calories for "meal" from stew -- 10.8%
-
- Meat Loaf Menu
- Total calories of
meal -- 763
- Calories of meat loaf
-- 228
- Fat from meat loaf --
17.5g
- Percent of fat
calories from meat loaf -- 69%
- Percent of fat
calories for "meal" from meat loaf --
21%
-
- Chicken Water
Chestnut Casserole Menu
- Total calories of
meal -- 492
- Calories of casserole
-- 189
- Fat from casserole --
9.2g
- Percent of fat
calories from casserole -- 44%
- Percent of fat
calories for "meal" from casserole --
16.8%
As you can see in the
above three menus, the percent of fat calories for the
main course varies from 25 to 69 percent and yet each
menu meets the 30 percent fat guideline.
Maybe together we can come
up with ranges of fat for main dishes, meat only, side
dishes, breads and grains, and desserts. Please call or
write to me with your ideas. (JD)
Communication and
Nutrition Programs
Recently a conference entitled
"Effective Nutrition Communication for Behavior
Change" was held in Paris by the International
Nutrition Planners Forum and UNESCO to review the use of
social marketing in nutrition programs. Multidisciplinary
teams consisting of a nutritionist, program manager and
media specialist from twelve countries attended. Some
observations and conclusions from the conference have
implications for nutrition education programming in
Extension.
Most social marketing
nutrition programs are targeted at mothers.
Additional efforts are needed to influence the
health community and policy makers.
Perceptions of
problems, priorities and solutions vary according
to training and experience. Consensus building is
needed to reach a common ground for problem
solving.
Social marketing
needs to include both top-down and bottom-up
approaches to increase the interaction of people
from all levels.
The best results are
achieved when multiple channels are used to
communicate messages. (MS)
Source: Mothers and
Children, Vol. 11, No. 1, 1992.
Food Allergies in Infants
Although research indicates that less than
10 percent of babies have allergic reactions to food, if
yours is one of them it is a major problem to you. So,
what causes the allergic reaction? It's a
"foreign" protein--a protein that the body does
not recognize as its own.
The most common causes of
allergy in infants are the foreign proteins in milk, such
as cow milk protein or soy bean protein found in infant
formula. Foreign proteins eaten by the mother can also be
passed to the infant during breast-feeding.
Usually it takes several
exposures to the particular protein before a reaction
occurs. The reactions may include diarrhea, skin rash,
colic or in extreme instances, swelling of the mouth,
eyes and throat. The symptoms vary and an infant may have
different reactions when re-exposed to the same protein.
Some common infant
problems, such as excessive salivation, spitting up,
recurrent colds, and ear infections, are many times
blamed on food allergies. Generally, these are not
related to an allergy to food. And when a baby has some
typical symptoms of food allergy they may not always be
the result of an allergy. For instance, incomplete
digestion of milk sugar (lactose) can cause vomiting and
diarrhea, but lactose intolerance is not an allergy and
requires different treatment.
When the baby gets older
and is introduced to new foods, there is exposure to a
great many of potential allergy causing proteins. This is
why it is recommended that you introduce one new food at
a time and give it to your baby for several days to check
for any adverse reactions. If there is a reaction, remove
the food from the diet and wait for the symptoms to
clear. Serve the food again later and if the symptoms
recur a food allergy is likely. This is really the only
way to document an allergy in infants, because skin
testing and laboratory tests generally are not useful for
them.
If your family has a
history of food allergies, wait to introduce foods that
commonly cause intolerance until the baby is at least a
year old. Some common allergens are citrus fruits,
peanuts, eggs, wheat, fish, and tomatoes. In the case of
suspected milk allergy, avoid erratic formula changes.
Most brands of formula are basically the same anyway. Ask
your doctor. A pediatrician can also suggest a formula
that contains neither cow's milk or soy protein.
If your baby does show
symptoms of food allergy, don't give up on the food
forever. Fortunately, most food allergies with intestinal
symptoms disappear by the time the infant is one to two
years old. (PP)
Source: Children's
Nutrition Research Center. Food Allergies in Infants.
Nutrition and Your Child. Winter 1991.
Baby-Friendly Hospital
Initiative
With the support of world leaders, health
experts and non-governmental organizations, UNICEF and
the World Health Organization have launched the
Baby-Friendly Hospital Initiative (BFHI), a global
campaign to foster breastfeeding. The goal of the
initiative is to mobilize health care systems and health
workers to support breastfeeding. The long-term aim is to
enable all women to feed their infants exclusively on
breast milk from 4 to 6 months of age and give children
appropriate and adequate complementary foods past their
second birthday.
Provision of low-cost
formula to maternity wards and hospitals is an obstacle
to breastfeeding. Consultations with formula companies,
WHO and UNICEF have led a commitment by industry to end
free or subsidized supplies of infant formula to
maternity wards and hospitals in developing countries by
the end of 1992.
A strategy to end supplies
to hospitals and clinics was implemented in 12 countries
in 1991. It is expected that by the end of 1992 another
66 countries will stop the distribution of infant formula
to new mothers. (MS)
Source: Mothers and
Children, Vol. 11, No. 1, 1992.
Let's Eat More Fruits
and Vegetables
"Americans are not eating enough
fruits and vegetables," so say extension food and
nutrition specialists at KSU and the nutritionists with
the Kansas Department of Health and Environment
(KDH&E). While total consumption of fruits and
vegetables is up, only 9 percent of U. S. adults are
eating five or more servings daily. Ten percent of them
had no fruits, fruit juice or vegetables on any given
day. A telephone survey conducted by KDH&E in 1990
indicated that 60 percent of those surveyed do not eat
fruit daily. Adequate vegetable consumption is
questionable as well; for example 83 percent report
eating green salad less than daily.
People have all kinds of
excuses for not eating fruits and vegetables. Some
complain they cost too much. (Have they really compared
the cost of a piece of fruit or serving of vegetable with
a bottle of pop or other popular snack?) Others just
never learned to like them as children. In today's
time-pressured families, cooking a vegetable or fixing a
salad is seen as taking too much time and not very
important. Parents are frustrated when their children
refuse to eat them and they give the child a vitamin pill
in hopes that it will replace missing nutrients.
Unfortunately, such thinking is wrong. Food has a wide
variety of components besides protein, vitamins, and
minerals, the nutrients perceived by the public as being
most important. Take fiber, for example. Bowels don't
function right without fiber. Now research findings point
to a wide variety of plant chemicals as being cancer
fighters, not just the antioxidant vitamins A, C and E.
And fruits and vegetables are the best weight control
food groups around.
So when it comes to
deciding what you're going to eat at your next meal or
snack, reach for a fruit or veggie. No diet should be
without five servings each and every day. (MC)
Incidence of Low Birth
Weight Is Up
Despite a slight drop in infant deaths in
the U. S., the number of low birth weights is up,
according to Louis Sullivan, Secretary of Health and
Human Services. The rate of low birth weight (LBW) is the
highest it has been since 1978, up from 6.9 percent in
1988 to 7 percent in 1989. But data suggest that the
infant mortality rate declined 2 percent in 1991, from
deaths in the first year of life per 1000 births in 1990
to 8.9 deaths per 1000 births last year.
Unfortunately, higher
survival rates reflect better technology rather than an
increase in prenatal care or a lower incidence of women
smoking and drinking during pregnancy. According to
Jennifer Howse, President of the March of Dimes Birth
Defects Foundation, the babies who are surviving are
increasingly handicapped and sickly. Scientists say that
20-40 percent of all LBW's are linked to maternal smoking
or drinking. Yet 20 percent of all women drink alcohol or
smoke during pregnancy.
Some groups appear to have
a greater incidence of LBW and higher infant mortality
rates. Teenage mothers and unmarried women are less
likely to get prenatal care or to gain recommended
weight. African Americans have double the infant
mortality rates of white. (MS)
Source: CNI, April 24,
1992
McDonald's Today-
Promotes Dietary Guidelines
McDonald's has a brochure entitled
McDonald's Today which translates the dietary guidelines
into a variety of menu choices from McDonald's. This
brochure was developed for health care professionals and
their patients.
The brochure shows sample
breakfasts, lunches and dinners that contain less than 30
percent of calories from fat and 10 percent of calories
or less from saturated fat. All but two meals contain
less than one-third of the daily recommendation for
cholesterol and sodium.
Nutrition information per
serving for all standard menu items at McDonald's is also
listed. To obtain the McDonald's Today brochure write or
call McDonald's Educational Resource Center, 3620 Swenson
Avenue, P. O. Box 8002, St. Charles, Illinois 60174-8002;
1-800-627-7646. FAX: 1-708-513-1669. (JD)
K-State Research and Extension is a short name for the
Kansas State University Agricultural Experiment Station and Cooperative
Extension Service, a program designed to generate and distribute useful
knowledge for the well-being of Kansans. Supported by county, state, federal and
private funds, the program has county Extension offices, experiment fields, area
Extension offices and regional research centers statewide. Its headquarters is
on the K-State campus, Manhattan.
|