|
body |
|
|
|
| Biotechnology in the News | |
|
BIOTECHNOLOGY IN THE NEWS FOR 2002 Insect Resistance Management Grower Survey for Bt Field Corn 2002 Growing Season National Corn Growers December 2002Monsanto Receives Final Regulatory Clearance For Bollgard II Cotton TechnologyST. LOUIS (December 23, 2002) - Monsanto announced today that it has received full U.S. regulatory clearance for its Bollgard II insect-protected cotton technology. This announcement means that U.S. cotton producers will have access to cotton seed containing this technology for the 2003 planting season. INSECT RESISTANCE MANAGEMENT COMPLIANCE ASSURANCE PROGRAM National Corn Growers - Nov. 2002. The IRM Compliance Assurance Program has been approved by the EPA and is effective immediately. * All Bt corn growers must follow the same IRM requirements and will be subjected to consistent compliance standards regardless of the registrants and/or seed companies with whom they choose to do business. * Growers who do not comply with the IRM requirements in two consecutive years will be denied access to Bt corn the third year. Although the Compliance Assurance Program is intended to allow for flexibility in the specific methods that are employed by the individual registrants, each company must: 1) provide a mechanism for evaluating the extent of IRM compliance among Bt corn growers, and 2) provide a mechanism for responding to instances of noncompliance in a manner that brings noncompliant growers back into compliance with the IRM requirements.ProdiGene Under Investigation for Possible Biotech Permit Violations by Roger Bernard, From Pro Farmer, 11/14/2002: During a compliance inspection in October 2002, APHIS found potential permit violations by ProdiGene at a site in Nebraska that had been used for small-scale field testing of genetically engineered corn in 2001. APHIS discovered tasseled volunteer corn plants growing in a soybean field that stands on the site of the 2001 field test. The presence of these plants is a violation of permit conditions. After finding the plants, APHIS instructed ProdiGene to remove the volunteer corn plants from the field, despite the fact that the corn plants did not have viable seed. However, the soybeans were harvested before all of the tasseled corn was removed. U.S. Investigating Biotech Contamination Case By ANDREW POLLACK, New York Times, November 14, In this case, ProdiGene, a company based in College Station, Tex., had grown corn containing some substance that it would not identify on a small test plot, less than an acre, in Nebraska last year. This year, the field was planted with soybeans, but some corn stalks still appeared from seed left over in the ground, which is not uncommon. About 500 bushels of soybeans were contaminated with some of this corn, Ms. Smith said. Those soybeans, however, were brought to a grain elevator and mixed with 500,000 bushels of soybeans. Crop - Mixing Probe Looks at ProdiGene Filed at 11:36 a.m. ET, November 14, 2002WASHINGTON (AP) -- The government is investigating whether a biotechnology company broke federal rules by mixing genetically modified crops with soybeans in Iowa and Nebraska. The Agriculture Department announced late Wednesday that ProdiGene Inc., of College Station, Texas, violated federal rules in September when it failed to completely remove corn kernels remaining from a biotech corn crop planted in Iowa last year. Federal officials had ordered the company to burn the 155 acres of corn. ProdiGene is a company that produces plant-made pharmaceuticals and industrial products. The government has strict guidelines for planting and removing such crops to make sure those products do not mix with the food supply or mingle with neighboring crops. Corn Near Gene-Altered Site to Be Destroyed WASHINGTON, Nov. 13 (Bloomberg News) — Federal regulators said today that they had ordered the destruction of an Iowa cornfield surrounding a test site for gene-altered crops. The incident involving ProdiGene Inc. is the second in two days in which regulators said there was a risk of gene-altered crops contaminating the food supply. On Tuesday, regulators quarantined a Nebraska grain elevator after finding stalks and leaves from ProdiGene's gene-altered corn mixed with soybeans. That batch will also be destroyed. Biotech Industry Adopts Precaution Altered Plants Banned Near Major Food Crops, By Justin Gillis, Washington Post Staff Writer, Tuesday, October 22, 2002; Page E01: Spurred by growing fear that drugs or chemicals made in gene-altered plants will taint the food supply, the North American biotechnology industry is adopting a broad moratorium on planting certain types of crops in major food-producing regions. The voluntary ban, which goes beyond any proposed government regulation, is designed to prevent the spread of exotic genes into field crops likely to be used for food or animal feed. Its most immediate impact will be to bar companies from planting certain types of gene-altered corn in the Midwest farm belt or from planting some types of the rape plant (from which canola oil is produced) on the Canadian prairie, but the ban could eventually apply to numerous crops and regions. INSECT
RESISTANCE MANAGEMENT Therefore, the registrants of Bt corn products (Dow AgroSciences, Monsanto Company, Pioneer Hi-Bred International, Inc., and Syngenta Seeds, Inc.) registered by EPA in October 2001, working through the Agricultural Biotechnology Stewardship Technical Committee (ABSTC), are implementing a multifaceted strategy for promoting grower compliance with the IRM requirements and preserving the effectiveness of Bt corn, consistent with the terms and conditions of registration for those products. Bt corn growers have been following the IRM requirements since 1999. Highlights of the program include:
FAO
TO SOUTH AFRICAN COUNTRIES: CONSIDER CAREFULLY BEFORE REJECTING FOOD AID CCST
REPORT ON GMF BENEFITS AND RISKS AVAILABLE ON-LINE The California Council on Science and Technology has made available on-line its
report on the benefits and risks of genetically modified foods (GMF). The report
provides a concise review of the scientific literature on the benefits and risks
of food biotechnology for the State of California Food Biotechnology Task Force
and its Advisory Committee. The document, which focuses on food biotechnology
issues based on sound science and modern farming technologies, was published in
late July 2002. HYPOALLERGENIC
SOYBEANS DEVELOPED GM
CROPS PROFITABLE AND GREEN, SAYS US REPORT US
PROPOSES NEW SYSTEMS REGARDING GM CROPS BT
TECHNOLOGY ASSESSED NITROGEN-FIXATION
GENE FOUND
IMPACT
OF PLANT BIOTECH FOR IMPROVING PEST MANAGEMENT June 2002 ENVIRONMENTAL
IMPACT OF AGRICULTURAL BIOTECHNOLOGY May 2002 Comment Period on Corn Rootworm Protected Corn Now Through May 13, 2002 The USDA currently has a comment period open regarding the new transgenic corn rootworm corns. Comments are expected to impact both the timing and the focus of the approval process. Anyone with comments regarding this new technology can write a letter to: Docket No. 00-078-1 Or you can comment by e-mail, by sending a message to: Or you can send comments by way of a web site at: http://www.Corn-Comments.org
Unapproved Canola Seed May Be on Farms, Makers Say By ANDREW POLLACK, New York Times, April 16, 2002: Monsanto and Aventis CropScience said yesterday that some genetically modified canola seeds that have not been approved in the United States might have found their way to farmers' fields. The two companies are now seeking regulatory approval of those seeds to avoid product recalls. GM activists call for ban to protect poor farmers By Steve Connor, Science Editor, The Independent, UK, 08 April 2002: Environmentalists will press delegates at an international conference on biodiversity this week to ban a controversial form of genetic modification that deliberately sterilises crop seeds. The United Nations Convention on Biological Diversity, held in The Hague, will be told that so-called "terminator genes" are immoral because they prevent the world's poorest farmers from saving some of their harvest for planting the following year. Seed companies say introducing terminator genes into some GM crops will ensure the seed does not spread in the wild, but it would also offer them obvious commercial benefits because farmers would have to buy fresh seed each year. Journal Editors Disavow Article on Biotech Corn By Marc Kaufman, Washington Post Staff Writer, Thursday, April 4, 2002: The science journal Nature has concluded that a controversial article it published last year on the discovery of genetically engineered corn growing in Mexico was not well researched enough and should not have been published. CIMMYT Responds to “Joint Statement” on Genetically Modified Maize in Mexico:February 22, 2002 Monarchs
and Bt corn: A research update
GM
pollen 'harmless to butterflies Monday, 11 February, 2002, |
|
|
||
| EMAIL BIOTECH WEBMASTER | ||
| Kansas
State University Agricultural Experiment Station and Cooperative Extension Service © 2000 |
Site Map K-State Biotechnology Home Page
K-State Research and Extension is an equal opportunity provider and employer.